
Who is the real Spider-Man?
So much has been written about the actual origin of the now legendary Spider-Man that you could fill several books with it. Stan Lee always claimed to have created the character on his own. Steve Ditko held it against him, because he claimed the design of the costume and at least a considerable part of the character for himself. And Jack Kirby claimed to have supplied the basic idea and the name for Spider-Man.
Ditko's dark dystopia
Who invented it? No idea. Presumably all three icons of American superhero culture had something to do with the creation of our friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man. But that's not what this is about. This is about how the character was shaped by three artists who are responsible for us knowing Spider-Man the way he swings through the street canyons of New York today, like an asphalt Tarzan.
Steve Ditko was certainly the man who defined him first and gave him his essential features. Ditko's Spider-Man was lean and muscular and wore a meticulously fine-meshed costume with the distinctive web pattern that probably nobody after him managed so skilfully. Kirby, who drew Spider-Man a few times, certainly didn't manage it at all. (Sorry, King of Comics, I may be a Kirby fan, but …)
The world of Ditko's Spider-Man was always dark, gloomy, shot through with shadows and somewhat menacing. Main characters and extras alike displayed Ditko's slightly exaggerated gestures and facial expressions, which sometimes reminded you of the old silent films. And quite often you had the impression of having drifted slightly into caricature.

Romita's rocking dynamism
Things were quite different with John Romita, who took over the pen from Ditko in the mid-1960s after Ditko had fallen out with Stan Lee. After a few issues that still looked a little clumsy and angular, Romita very quickly found the brilliant Spider-Man style and visually redefined the web-slinger.
The hero became a little more muscular, his costume a shade lighter and the web design somewhat looser. That also had the advantage of saving time, because fewer web lines had to be meticulously inked. The setting changed completely too: you were no longer in a gloomy, twilit New York, but on sunny streets with pretty women smiling enchantingly.
Romita definitely took Spider-Man to a new level. Today young people would probably call it “Next Level Shit“. I can only agree, and Romita's visual version lasted more than twenty years, even though he by no means drew Spider-Man for that long. Artists who followed him, such as Ross Andru, adopted his version practically one to one.

The pen of the fan
And then came Todd McFarlane. He belonged to the first generation of artists recruited from former fans. McFarlane had grown up with comics and entered the industry, which was looking for new talent in the late eighties.
His Spider-Man is a logical visual evolution, and the most essential features are probably the oversized eye slits, you can hardly call them slits any more, and his very special way of drawing the web line from Spidey's wrist glands. To top it all, he went back to Steve Ditko and multiplied the webbing in the red part of the costume again.

I don't want to go any further here, and I'd rather keep quiet about the dreadful new variants of Spider-Man's costume in recent years. I've never understood why you have to change something that is absolutely iconic and known to everyone.
So there they are, the three essential interpretations of a legendary comic character. Which one is the best? Everyone has to decide that for themselves, and it probably also depends on which of the three variants you first came into contact with. In any case, Spider-Man has one of the most visually interesting costumes in the entire superhero community!
What do you think, which of the three visual variants does Captain Collector like best?
Spider-Man in the shop
You'll find comics from all three eras at AMAZINGTOYS® under Spider-Man.








